ArticleTranslational psychiatry2025
Association between frailty and cognitive function: a pooled analysis of three ageing cohorts.
Article in Translational psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Characterization of Models for Identifying Physical and Cognitive Frailty in Older Adults With Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Dynamic frailty exposure and cognitive aging trajectories: A multicohort study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Predictive Value of the Triglyceride-Glucose-Frailty Index for Depression and Cognitive Function in Perimenopausal Women: Insights from CHARLS.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Altered cognition in patients following pulmonary embolism.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Influencing factors of initiation and maintenance of multidomain interventions in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a qualitative study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cross-sectional evidence suggested that frailty was an important risk factor for cognitive impairment. However, previous studies only focused on baseline frailty status, not taking into consideration the dynamic changes in frailty status during follow-up. This study aimed to investigate the associations between changes in frailty status and cognitive impairment. This study used data from three prospective cohorts: China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). Frailty status was evaluated by the frailty index and classified as robust, pre-frailty, or frailty. Cognitive function was assessed by memory, orientation and executive function. Linear mixed regression model was used to evaluate the longitudinal relationship between frailty statuses with cognitive impairment. A total of 49,864 participants with a mean of 2.70 follow-up times were included in the analysis. The median follow-up periods were 2.89 years in the CHARLS, 3.32 years in the ELSA, and 8.40 years in the HRS. Compared with robust participants, both pre-frailty and frailty were significantly associated with declined global cognitive function (beta -0.11, 95% CI: [-0.12, -0.09] for pre-frailty and beta -0.29 [95% CI: -0.30, -0.27] for frailty). Significant associations were also observed for memory (beta -0.27, 95% CI: [-0.29, -0.26] for frailty), orientation (beta -0.15 [95% CI: -0.17, -0.13] for frailty), and executive function (beta -0.21 [95% CI: -0.23, -0.19] for frailty). The subgroup analysis revealed that the CHARLS cohort had the greatest effect, and it was the main source of heterogeneity. Pre-frailty and frailty are associated with an increased risk of cognitive impairment, highlighting the need for early assessment and monitoring of frailty in at-risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.