Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41253693›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2025

Correlation between exposure (mAs) and image quality for a rapid cone-beam CT on a ring gantry linear accelerator.

Hui Zhao, Nicholas Nelson, Seth Streitmatter, Bradley Nordin, Thomas Martin, Ryan G Price, Jeremy N Kunz, Stephen Bhagroo, Y Jessica Huang, Geoff Nelson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hui ZhaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Nicholas NelsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6608-4276
Seth StreitmatterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Bradley NordinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Thomas MartinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4519-4983
Ryan G PriceDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0624-6629
Jeremy N KunzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1270-8001
Stephen BhagrooDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Y Jessica HuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Geoff NelsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8742-5009

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe adoption of HyperSight CBCT has become widespread due to its rapid CBCT scan acquisition (< 6 s) and superior image quality. Numerous studies have been conducted to evaluate HyperSight CBCT's image quality and the accuracy of treatment planning dose calculations using HyperSight CBCT. Nevertheless, for the main function of CBCT as a tool of image guided radiation therapy (IGRT), one clinically significant question remains unanswered: What is the quantitative correlation between exposure level (mAs) and desired image quality? This study aims to explore the quantitative correlation between exposure level and image quality, providing guidelines for selecting the appropriate CBCT mAs based on imaging objectives and patient size for the optimal IGRT alignment. PURPOSE: To investigate the correlation between HyperSight CBCT (equipped on Halcyon linear accelerator) exposure level and image quality.

methodsNine-series of 261 sets CBCT scans were acquired using HyperSight on the Halcyon (125 kV, 133-971 mAs, FOV: 28.2, 36, and 53.8 cm). Three-series were acquired with the CatPhan 604 alone, three-series with CatPhan 604 surrounded by a 32 cm custom-made acrylic annulus, and three series with CatPhan 604 surrounded by a 40 cm custom-made acrylic annulus. Image quality metrics were analyzed included signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), image noise, low-contrast visibility (LCV), uniformity index (UI), integral non-uniformity (INU), and modulation transfer function (MTF). The correlation between mAs and image quality was evaluated.

resultsThe SNR and CNR for all material inserts increased with rising mAs for all scans, with a higher amplitude of increase for scans without annuli. The SNR and CNR were higher for scans without annuli. Both image noise and LCV decreased with rising mAs and were higher for scans with annuli. The UI was independent of mAs for scans of CatPhan alone and CatPhan with a small annulus, and was slightly higher for scans without annuli (∼0.1 vs ∼0.2). The INU slightly increased with rising mAs and was higher for scans without annuli. MTF was independent of mAs and with or without annuli. MTF values varied with FOV, with smaller FOV yielding better image sharpness. All parameters were FOV-dependent except INU, and generally, the larger the FOV, the better the image quality (except spatial resolution).

conclusionsHyperSight CBCT acquisition is recommended to be performed with a maximum FOV of 53.8 cm. To meet the Rose criterion, for a 20 cm width object, CBCT should be acquired at ≥154 mAs; for a 32 cm width object, CBCT should be acquired at ≥572.6 mAs to reach a 3σ confidence level; for a 40 cm object, CBCT should be acquired at ≥572.6 mAs to reach a 3σ confidence level for all materials except polystyrene (soft-tissue).

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeoplasmsParticle AcceleratorsPhantoms, ImagingRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsHumansRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedHyperSight CBCTimage qualityRose criterion

Identifiers

PMID41253693
PMCPMC12626742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.