ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2025
Correlation between exposure (mAs) and image quality for a rapid cone-beam CT on a ring gantry linear accelerator.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Image quality robustness of HyperSight-enabled versus conventional iterative cone-beam CT across patient size and imaging geometry.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Development of CBCT-Guided Online Adaptive Radiotherapy.Cancers · 2026Review
- Multi-institutional validation of hypersight CBCT-based dose calculation on O-ring linacs.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- A clinical evaluation of HyperSight CBCT enhanced offline adaptive breast radiotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Correlation between exposure (mAs) and image quality for a rapid cone-beam CT on a ring gantry linear accelerator.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe adoption of HyperSight CBCT has become widespread due to its rapid CBCT scan acquisition (< 6 s) and superior image quality. Numerous studies have been conducted to evaluate HyperSight CBCT's image quality and the accuracy of treatment planning dose calculations using HyperSight CBCT. Nevertheless, for the main function of CBCT as a tool of image guided radiation therapy (IGRT), one clinically significant question remains unanswered: What is the quantitative correlation between exposure level (mAs) and desired image quality? This study aims to explore the quantitative correlation between exposure level and image quality, providing guidelines for selecting the appropriate CBCT mAs based on imaging objectives and patient size for the optimal IGRT alignment. PURPOSE: To investigate the correlation between HyperSight CBCT (equipped on Halcyon linear accelerator) exposure level and image quality.
methodsNine-series of 261 sets CBCT scans were acquired using HyperSight on the Halcyon (125 kV, 133-971 mAs, FOV: 28.2, 36, and 53.8 cm). Three-series were acquired with the CatPhan 604 alone, three-series with CatPhan 604 surrounded by a 32 cm custom-made acrylic annulus, and three series with CatPhan 604 surrounded by a 40 cm custom-made acrylic annulus. Image quality metrics were analyzed included signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), image noise, low-contrast visibility (LCV), uniformity index (UI), integral non-uniformity (INU), and modulation transfer function (MTF). The correlation between mAs and image quality was evaluated.
resultsThe SNR and CNR for all material inserts increased with rising mAs for all scans, with a higher amplitude of increase for scans without annuli. The SNR and CNR were higher for scans without annuli. Both image noise and LCV decreased with rising mAs and were higher for scans with annuli. The UI was independent of mAs for scans of CatPhan alone and CatPhan with a small annulus, and was slightly higher for scans without annuli (∼0.1 vs ∼0.2). The INU slightly increased with rising mAs and was higher for scans without annuli. MTF was independent of mAs and with or without annuli. MTF values varied with FOV, with smaller FOV yielding better image sharpness. All parameters were FOV-dependent except INU, and generally, the larger the FOV, the better the image quality (except spatial resolution).
conclusionsHyperSight CBCT acquisition is recommended to be performed with a maximum FOV of 53.8 cm. To meet the Rose criterion, for a 20 cm width object, CBCT should be acquired at ≥154 mAs; for a 32 cm width object, CBCT should be acquired at ≥572.6 mAs to reach a 3σ confidence level; for a 40 cm object, CBCT should be acquired at ≥572.6 mAs to reach a 3σ confidence level for all materials except polystyrene (soft-tissue).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.