ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2025
Dual flatness filter design for single energy photon beam of medical linear accelerator - Rationale and efficacy.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dual flatness filter design for single energy photon beam of medical linear accelerator - Rationale and efficacy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLinear accelerators used for cancer treatments, in general, have one flattening filter (FF) for each x-ray energy. In a newly developed 6 MV low energy linac model, beam optimization at higher dose rates is achieved by two FFs. PURPOSE: To achieve optimization in higher dose rates for smaller fields with FF, one small flattening filter (SF) for fields covering up to 16 × 16 cm
methodsRecently, a new generation low energy Siddharth II model 6 MV linac is manufactured by M/s Panacea Medical Technologies Pvt Ltd in India, with two FFs. Experimentally measured dose rates with SF and FF vis-à-vis un-flattened open beam were compared with theoretical estimates. Furthermore, a comparison is made with beam characteristics of a True Beam Varian linear accelerator for 6 MV beam.
resultsAs beam hardening is expected with FF, it was taken appropriate to consider 1.20 MeV mean energy for 6 MV bremsstrahlung continuous spectrum, before entry to FF. Measured transmissions of 0.8140 and 0.4470 for SF and LF, respectively, compare well with theoretically estimated 0.7904 and 0.4130. A dose rate enhancement factor 1.821 is achieved along with better flatness for smaller fields. The measured factor 0.4470 for large filter for Siddharth II, is similar to a transmission of 0.5100 for True Beam 6 MV photons.
conclusionAs the first of its kind, the thin FF covers smaller solid angle of the total beam, giving higher MU/min in small fields, which might help for radical treatments. Also, there will be less power input requirements because of gain in dose rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.