ArticleJournal of biomechanics2026
Along- and cross-muscle fiber shear moduli in skeletal muscle.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The material properties of muscle play a central role in how muscle resists joint motion, transmits forces, and repairs itself. While many studies have evaluated muscle's tensile properties, few have investigated muscle's shear properties. Our objective was to quantify the shear moduli along (along-muscle fiber) and transverse (cross-muscle fiber) to muscle fibers. We collected data from the extensor digitorum longus, tibialis anterior, and soleus from rat hindlimbs to evaluate the consistency of shear moduli across muscles. We applied strains and measured stress in three configurations (parallel, perpendicular, across) and used our measurements to determine the along- and cross-muscle fiber tensile and shear moduli. Our methods are the first to account for tensile strain during shear loading and compare measurements between muscles. The measured shear stress-strain slope was greater in the perpendicular compared with parallel and across configurations for all muscles. After accounting for both tensile and shear components, we found that the Young's modulus was greater in the along- relative to cross-muscle fiber direction while there was no significant difference between the along- and cross-muscle fiber shear moduli. Therefore, differences in the measured stress-strain slopes were due to differences in tensile strain applied during shear loading rather than the shear moduli. There were no significant differences in shear or Young's moduli between muscle groups, suggesting that material properties are consistent between muscles. Our results characterize shear properties across skeletal muscles, providing a novel dataset to assign muscle properties in computational models and compare with image-based estimates of stiffness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.