Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41252749›Full record

ReviewACS synthetic biology2025

Genetically Reprogramming Crops and Rhizobacteria for Nutritional Iron Biofortification.

Taden B Welsh, Christopher M Dundas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS synthetic biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Taden B WelshDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, United States.ORCID 0009-0007-1654-1441
Christopher M DundasDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9183-8236

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Iron is a critical micronutrient for both plants and humans, yet its declining availability across agricultural systems threatens global food security and health. Biofortification of food crops has emerged as a promising strategy to combat iron deficiency and anemia, leveraging both crop breeding and microbiome-based approaches to enhance iron mobilization and uptake. Advances in plant and bacterial synthetic biology could enable the precise programming of iron homeostasis and acquisition mechanisms, offering tailored solutions across diverse species and environments. Here, we outline key biomolecules, genes, and biosynthetic and transport pathways that represent underexplored synthetic biology targets for improving crop iron acquisition. We highlight opportunities to tune expression strength, tissue specificity, and cross-host pathway transfer to enhance chelation- and reduction-mediated solubilization of soil iron and augment plant uptake. Finally, we emphasize the broader importance of developing plant-microbe-metal actuators as modular components in genetic circuit design and discuss how their deployment across diverse plant and microbial chassis could accelerate agricultural biofortification and improve global nutrition.

Indexed as

BiofortificationCrops, AgriculturalIronPlants, Genetically ModifiedSynthetic BiologyIron

Identifiers

PMID41252749
PMCPMC12723747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.