Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41252592›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of biophysics2026

Fold-Switching Proteins.

Devlina Chakravarty, Lauren L Porter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of biophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Shining light on the dark proteome with unstructural biology.Current research in structural biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Determinants of Protein Folding Pathways: Lessons from Metamorphic Proteins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Devlina ChakravartyNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; email: devlina.chakravarty@nih.gov, porterll@nih.gov.
Lauren L PorterNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; email: devlina.chakravarty@nih.gov, porterll@nih.gov.

Funding

Predictions and experimental validation of fold-switching proteinsZIALM202011 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI PORTER, LAUREN · 2020 to 2025
$6.5M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA LM202011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globular proteins are expected to assume folds with fixed secondary structures, α-helices and β-sheets. Fold-switching proteins challenge this expectation by remodeling their secondary and/or tertiary structures in response to cellular stimuli. Though these shape-shifting proteins were once thought to be haphazard evolutionary by-products with little intrinsic biological relevance, recent work has shown that evolution has selected for their dual-folding behavior, which plays critical roles in biological processes across all kingdoms of life. The widening scope of fold switching draws attention to the ways it challenges conventional wisdom, raising fundamental unanswered questions about protein structure, biophysics, and evolution. Here we discuss the progress being made to answer these questions and suggest future directions for the field.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingProteinsAnimalsHumansModels, MolecularProteinsfold-switching proteinsmetamorphic proteinsprotein designprotein evolutionprotein foldingprotein structure prediction

Identifiers

PMID41252592
PMCPMC12629603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.