Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41252464›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

SegCycle-SPADE: An end-to-end framework for semantic segmentation-based automated extraction and artistic reconstruction of traditional craft patterns using conditional GAN.

Bei Huang, Lequn Mo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bei HuangSchool of Art and Design, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6792-109X
Lequn MoInformation College of Guangdong Communication Polytechnic, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper addresses the challenge of traditional handicraft pattern extraction and generation, focusing on accurate segmentation and high-quality pattern reconstruction. We propose the SegCycle-SPADE model, combining SegFormer for semantic segmentation, CycleGAN for pattern generation, and SPADE for style transfer, to achieve a balance between segmentation accuracy, generation quality, and inference efficiency. Experiments on datasets such as Batik Nitik 960, Fashion-MNIST, and DeepFashion show that SegCycle-SPADE outperforms baseline models like U-Net and DeepLabV3+ with significant improvements in PA (88.6%), mIoU (78.1%), and Boundary F1 (73.8%). In terms of pattern generation, SegCycle-SPADE also achieves superior results in PSNR (27.8 dB), SSIM (0.89), and FID (34.2), outperforming Pix2Pix, Stable Diffusion, and other models. The model demonstrates its potential for the digital regeneration of traditional handicraft patterns, offering a robust solution for high-quality and efficient pattern generation, with substantial contributions to digital cultural heritage preservation and innovation.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedPattern Recognition, AutomatedSemanticsAlgorithmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID41252464
PMCPMC12626277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.