ArticlePLOS global public health2025
HIV services for fisherfolk in Sierra Leone: A formative assessment of barriers, opportunities, and community preferences.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In African fishing communities, landing sites are central to social and sexual networks, making them important areas for HIV transmission. Despite being identified as a priority group by the Sierra Leone Ministry of Health (MoH), there are limited data on fisherfolk's HIV risk or their preferences regarding HIV prevention, testing, linkage and treatment services. In May 2022, we conducted a formative assessment at two landing sites, using surveys and focus group discussions with 113 fisherfolk, including fishermen, fishmongers, fish traders, fish processors and community members, along with 17 interviews with MoH staff, fishermen union consortium, and health providers. Participants were mostly female (56%), married (70%), and middle-aged (median age 40); 64% had only primary education or less. While all had heard of HIV, 69% considered themselves at no or low risk, despite 32% having multiple recent sexual partners, 58% not knowing a partner's HIV status, and 34% not using condoms in the past month. Nearly half (48%) reported a prior STI, yet only 7% had heard of PrEP. Thirteen participants (12%) self-reported being HIV-positive, but just two were on treatment. Qualitative findings echoed low HIV knowledge and risk perception, with many noting the absence of recent condom distribution or HIV education efforts. Fisherfolk expressed a preference for receiving HIV services from nurses, ideally near landing sites. Stakeholders affirmed the need for targeted interventions. This assessment highlights a disconnect between risk behaviors and risk perception, and a lack of access to essential HIV services. To improve uptake and outcomes, it is critical to engage fisherfolk in designing community-based, differentiated HIV service delivery strategies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.