Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41252418›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Natural grasslands converted to afforested lands and abandoned lands decreasing soil carbon stability and storage, respectively, in the China's Loess Plateau.

Yao Zhong, Yumei Li, Xuemao Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yao ZhongCollege of Geography and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4253-4020
Yumei LiCollege of Geography and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou, China.
Xuemao ZhaoCollege of Geography and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Active particulate organic carbon (POC) and inert mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC) play critical roles in regulating and predicting global climate change. However, our understanding remains limited regarding how land-use changes differentially affect these two carbon fractions and their underlying driving mechanisms. In this study, we applied a physical fractionation approach to examine changes in the carbon content and mass fractions of particulate organic matter (POM) and mineral-associated organic matter (MAOM) following the conversion of grasslands to forested or abandoned lands on the Chinese Loess Plateau. This work provides the first systematic quantification of the trade-offs among different land-use types with respect to distinct soil carbon fractions in this region. The results revealed that land use significantly altered the distribution of carbon fractions. Although afforestation increased POC contents in both soil layers (9.70 and 7.82 g·kg ⁻ ¹, respectively), it markedly reduced the more stable MAOC contents (from 9.53 and 9.62 g·kg ⁻ ¹ to 7.53 and 6.08 g·kg ⁻ ¹ in the 0-0.15 m and 0.15-0.30 m layers, respectively) and MAOM mass fractions (from 77.46% to 68.16% and from 78.69% to 71.61%). In contrast, land abandonment led to an overall decline in both carbon fractions. Mechanistically, this study revealed distinct dominant drivers for POC and MAOC: soil physicochemical properties primarily governed POC variation (68.15%), whereas microbial communities controlled MAOC variation (67.01%). Notably, bacterial β-diversity exhibited a significant negative correlation with MAOC content, offering a new perspective on the role of microbes in carbon stabilization. In summary, grassland afforestation reduced soil carbon stability by inhibiting MAOC formation, while land abandonment decreased the total soil carbon pool. These findings suggest that maintaining natural grasslands may be the most effective approach for soil carbon conservation on the Loess Plateau, and that afforestation strategies should be carefully evaluated for their potential impacts on carbon stability.

Indexed as

CarbonGrasslandSoilCarbon SequestrationChinaClimate ChangeForestsSoil MicrobiologyCarbonSoil

Identifiers

PMID41252418
PMCPMC12626324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.