Trial reportPloS one2025
Less is more: Qualitative insights into physically active learning in secondary math education.
Trial report in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of physical activity on academic performance in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Students' aerobic fitness, self-regulation, and mathematical performance in primary school.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhysically active learning (PAL) has shown promise as a pedagogical approach that combines physical and academic benefits by incorporating physical activity during academic lessons. However, its implementation in secondary schools remains a challenge, highlighting the need to explore teachers' and students' perceptions and experiences.
aimTo assess the perceptions and experiences of teachers and students following their participation in a PAL intervention in secondary education.
methodsData were collected through individual interviews with mathematics teachers (n = 5) and six focus groups with students (n = 36) who participated in a 16-week intervention with a weekly outdoor PAL lesson. Data were analyzed using conventional content analysis.
resultsTeachers reported a general increase in students' motivation. They also noted an improvement in the participation and behavior of some students during PAL lessons. These aspects were also reported by the students themselves. Although teachers and students perceived that the amount of content covered in a PAL lesson was lower compared to traditional lessons, they emphasized that learning was more meaningful due to enhanced retention, facilitated by active engagement and dynamic teaching approaches. Teachers and students also perceived an improvement in students' cooperation and socialization. Teachers considered PAL to be a feasible pedagogical approach to implement, provided adequate resources were available.
conclusionsPAL is seen as a pedagogical approach that brings both social and academic benefits to secondary education. However, to ensure its effectiveness and long-term sustainability, it needs to be integrated into the whole educational community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.