ArticlePloS one2025
Developmental coordination disorder: "It's not on people's radars… They're not interested".
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDevelopmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) is an under-recognised neurodevelopmental disorder impacting 5-6% of children. There is plentiful research exploring the deleterious impacts of poor motor skill development, however there is a distinct lack of research gathering in-depth insights which explore the impact of DCD across life domains and the life course.
methodsTen lived experience interviews (parents of a child with a diagnosis of DCD) were undertaken online, lasting 30-45 minutes. Participants were recruited both nationally and internationally to understand cultural differences. Parent interviews focused on experiences in primary care, education, friendships, and wellbeing. Data were transcribed and analysed using inductive thematic analysis.
resultsIdentified major themes highlighted (i) impact of DCD on the lives of children and their families; (ii) lack of knowledge and awareness surrounding DCD; (iii) inadequate support; and (iv) the role of diagnosis. All of this culminated in parents feeling the need to become advocates in the face of a profound sense of relative abandonment.
conclusionChildren with DCD and their families face multiple profound challenges in relation to accessing help and support for their difficulties. More needs to be done to facilitate synergistic support for children with DCD and their families across healthcare, education and the wider community. Effective cross-sector care will however, not be possible without the development of evidence-based training for all, which is underpinned by insider voices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.