Observational studyJCI insight2026
Fecal microbiota transplantation promotes type 2 mucosal immune responses with colonic epithelium proliferation in patients with recurrent Clostridioides difficile.
Observational study in JCI insight, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02797288 (Clostridioides Difficile and Immune Responses in Acute CDI and Fecal Microbiota Transplant), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clostridioides Difficile and Immune Responses in Acute CDI and Fecal Microbiota Transplant
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distinct T and innate-like lymphocyte reprogramming following lyophilized fecal microbiota transplantation in recurrentGut microbes · 2026Article
- Review
- The selection of matching donors for patients in fecal microbiota transplantation.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Fecal microbiota transplantation reduces inflammation and modulates gene expression in HIV-infected double humanized-BLT (dHu-BLT) mice on antiretroviral therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Gut microbiota in Henoch-Schönlein purpura: from pathogenesis to therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUNDFecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is the most effective therapy for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI), yet its mechanism of action remains poorly understood.METHODSWe report the results of a clinical trial of patients undergoing FMT therapy for rCDI (n = 16), which analyzed colon biopsies, plasma, PBMCs, and stool at the time of FMT and 2-month follow-up. Plasma and colon biopsy samples were also collected from healthy controls for comparison with patients with rCDI. Microbiome composition, colonic gene expression, and immune changes were evaluated through high-throughput sequencing and immunoprofiling via flow cytometry.RESULTSNo patients experienced recurrence at follow-up. FMT significantly altered the intestinal microbiome but had no significant impact on the systemic immune system. In contrast, FMT promoted broad changes in colonic transcriptional profiles compared with both pre-FMT and healthy control biopsies, inhibiting genes associated with proinflammatory signaling and upregulating type 2 immunity and proliferative pathways (Myc and mTORC1). FMT increased expression of IL-33 and the type 2 immune EGFR family ligand amphiregulin, potentially explaining upregulation of Myc and mTORC1 pathways. Spatial transcriptomics demonstrated that these changes were localized to the colonic epithelium. Comparison of transcriptional profiles with available single-cell gene sets determined that post-FMT biopsies were enriched in signatures associated with proliferative cell types while repressing signatures of differentiated colonocytes.CONCLUSIONWe conclude that FMT promotes proliferation of the colonic epithelium in patients with rCDI, which may drive regeneration and protect against subsequent CDI.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicaltrials.gov NCT02797288.FUNDINGThis work was funded by grants from the NIH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.