Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41252196›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

A deep learning approach for the analysis of birdsong.

Therese M I Koch, Ethan S Marks, Todd F Roberts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Therese M I KochDepartment of Neuroscience, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5327-3219
Ethan S MarksDepartment of Neuroscience, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4415-9889
Todd F RobertsDepartment of Neuroscience, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0967-6598

Funding

The Genetic Basis of Vocal LearningR01DC020333 · NIDCD · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI ROBERTS, TODD F, TAKAHASHI, JOSEPH S · 2021 to 2025
$4.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC020333NIH HHS R01 DC020333The University of Texas at Dallas UTSW Green Fellow's ProgramThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Neural Scientist Training Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning tools for behavior analysis have enabled important insights and discoveries in neuroscience. Yet, they often compromise interpretability and generalizability for performance, making quantitative comparisons across datasets difficult. We developed a novel deep learning-based behavior analysis pipeline, Avian Vocalization Network (AVN), for zebra finch learned vocalizations - the most widely studied vocal learning model species. AVN annotates songs with high accuracy, generalizing across multiple animal colonies without re-training, and generates a comprehensive set of interpretable features describing song syntax, timing, and acoustic properties. We use this feature set to compare song phenotypes across research groups and experiments and to predict a bird's stage in song development. Additionally, we have developed a novel method to measure song imitation that requires no training data for new comparisons and outperforms existing similarity scoring methods in its sensitivity and agreement with expert human judgements. These tools are available through the open-source AVN python package and graphical application, making them accessible to researchers without prior coding experience. Altogether, this behavior analysis toolkit stands to accelerate the study of vocal behavior by standardizing phenotype and learning outcome mapping, thus helping scientists better link behavior to the underlying neural processes.

Indexed as

Deep LearningFinchesVocalization, AnimalAnimalsLearningbehavioral analaysisbirdsongdeep learningneurosciencezebra finch

Identifiers

PMID41252196
PMCPMC12626419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.