ArticleJAMA network open2025
Evaluation of a State-Level Incentive Program to Improve Diet.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impacts of incentivizing milk spending among SNAP participants.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- An evaluation of a state-level fruit and vegetable incentive's impacts on food and nutrition security among SNAP participants.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Fruit and vegetable incentive programs show promise for improving dietary quality among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participants, but few programs have been implemented at scale. Understanding state-level program effectiveness is critical for informing nutrition assistance policy. Objective: To evaluate the association of Eat Well, Be Well (EWBW), the first state-level SNAP fruit and vegetable incentive program launched in Rhode Island, with dietary intake and program awareness during initial implementation. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this pre-post cohort study with a comparison site (Connecticut) using difference-in-differences analysis, baseline data were collected from May 15 to September 30, 2023, with follow-up from June 12 to October 6, 2024 (5-8 months after implementation). Community-based recruitment took place across Rhode Island (intervention) and Connecticut (comparison), including food pantries and health fairs, as well as via text messages sent to participants from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children. Participants were current SNAP recipients, aged 18 years or older, English or Spanish speaking and had email or text access. Intervention: Automatic enrollment providing a $0.50 credit per $1 spent on fresh fruits and vegetables (up to $25/mo) at 2 grocery chains, with credits deposited on Electronic Benefits Transfer cards. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was change in total fruit and vegetable intake (measured as cup equivalents per 1000 kcal) via validated food frequency questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included diet quality (measured by the Healthy Eating Index-2015), program awareness, and use of the program. Results: Of the 725 participants (mean [SD] baseline age, 34.5 [10.1] years; 364 in Rhode Island and 361 in Connecticut), 690 were women (95.2%), and the mean (SD) household size was 3.9 (1.6) at baseline and follow-up. Baseline mean (SD) fruit and vegetable intake was 2.05 (1.19) cup equivalents per 1000 kcal in Rhode Island and 2.12 (1.25) cup equivalents per 1000 kcal in Connecticut. There was no significant change in fruit and vegetable intake in Rhode Island relative to Connecticut (0.12 [95% CI, -0.04 to 0.28] cup equivalents per 1000 kcal). Stratified analyses among those with higher baseline consumption of fruits and vegetables (>1.79 cup equivalents/1000 kcal) showed that fruit and vegetable intake significantly increased in Rhode Island relative to Connecticut (0.29 [95% CI, 0.03-0.54] cup equivalents per 1000 kcal), while those with lower baseline consumption of fruits and vegetables showed no change (0.00 [95% CI, -0.17 to 0.18] cup equivalents per 1000 kcal). A total of 134 of 364 Rhode Island respondents (36.8%) correctly identified the program's purpose and 96 of 364 (26.4%) reported using discounts available through the EWBW. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of SNAP participants, the 50% incentive, automatic enrollment EWBW program was not associated with significant relative changes in fruit and vegetable intake, but was associated with benefits among participants already consuming more fruits and vegetables. Enhanced implementation, including broader retail partnerships, improved outreach, and targeted interventions for populations with lower intake of fruits and vegetables, may be needed to maximize public health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.