ReviewAmerican journal of clinical dermatology2026
Perioperative Systemic Therapy for High-Risk Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Review in American journal of clinical dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) is on the rise. While the majority of cases are curable with surgery alone, the burden of high-risk tumors that require additional therapies is increasing. While systemic therapy has long been used to treat locally advanced and metastatic CSCC, immunotherapy is a more recent advancement, and use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant systemic therapy in the perioperative setting is an area of ongoing study. While chemotherapy, epidermal growth factor inhibitors, and chemoradiation have all been studied in the perioperative setting, the response is highly variable, and side effects are common. Immunotherapy, in particular programmed cell death protein/ligand-1 inhibitors, have revolutionized treatment of advanced CSCC. Cemiplimab and pembrolizumab have been studied for neoadjuvant and adjuvant use, and atezolizumab for neoadjuvant use. Cemiplimab has shown the most promise, with a 64-75% major or complete pathologic response rate in the neoadjuvant setting, and significantly improved recurrence, metastasis, and disease-free survival rates over placebo in the adjuvant setting. While neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy has evolved as a promising treatment option for high-risk CSCC, several questions remain unanswered and are subject to ongoing research. This includes investigating optimal treatment regimens, duration, and timing; developing methods to better predict and identify responders; establishing long-term outcomes and safety data; and carrying out further studies in special populations such as organ transplant recipients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41252099What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.