Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41252082›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2025

Genetic exceptionalism and genomic contextualism among Asian Americans: a qualitative study.

Sarah D Huang, Daphne Martschenko, Casey R Scherer, Kim F Chiang, Kevin Chang, Hetanshi Naik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah D HuangDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6458-4282
Daphne MartschenkoCenter for Biomedical Ethics, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9046-5893
Casey R SchererPerinatal Diagnostic Center, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4559-2984
Kim F ChiangDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-8836-5666
Kevin ChangDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-7689-5950
Hetanshi NaikDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. naikh@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5894-7390

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Views on genetic information - and how it compares to other health information - play a key role in shaping policy surrounding its treatment, management, and communication. Genetic exceptionalism and genomic contextualism are important frameworks to better understand how communities view genetic information in comparison to other medical data. This study aimed to explore how Asian Americans view genetic information and what factors influence their views. Using a qualitative study design guided by reflexive thematic analysis, we interviewed 20 ostensibly healthy Asian American adults about their attitudes toward and experiences with genetic information. We developed four themes: first, participants discussed diverse potential uses and qualities of genetic information that distinguished it from other types of health information, such as providing insight into future health conditions. However, they underscored the continued importance of other types of health information depending on context, and did not view genetic information as deterministic or the essence, giving weight to environmental contributors in molding who they are. Views on genetic information were shaped by complex, interacting factors at individual, family, and community or cultural levels, such as stigma, intersectional identities, and family dynamics. Participants had overall limited awareness of clinical genetics services and indications genetic testing could be offered for, despite high self-reported health literacy. Our participants' views on genetic information were complex and context-dependent, in line with genomic contextualism. This should be considered in providing culturally-engaged genetics education and developing genomics policies that reflect how diverse communities truly feel about genetic information.

Indexed as

Asian AmericansCommunity health beliefsFamily communicationGenetic exceptionalismGenomic contextualism

Identifiers

PMID41252082
PMCPMC12627301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.