ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2026
Validation of the Scale of Distinctive Elements in the Drawings of Subjects with Psychotic Symptoms: A Study Protocol.
Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article presents a study protocol for evaluating a psychometric scale designed to identify distinctive elements in the drawings of individuals with psychotic symptoms. The study aims to validate the "Scale of Distinctive Elements in the Drawings of Subjects with Psychotic Symptoms," a tool that evaluates 25 specific features in drawings, including ambiguity, disorganization, stereotypy, and oddity. The research involved two groups: 40 participants with psychotic symptoms and 100 healthy controls. These participants created drawings that were subsequently evaluated by trained raters. The study employed both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses to evaluate the scale's structure and validity. The research highlights the potential of art therapy as an adjunctive treatment for schizophrenia, providing insights into the mental state of patients that are challenging to capture through verbal methods alone. The development of this scale addresses the need for standardized tools to assess the effectiveness of art therapy, particularly in individuals with severe psychiatric disorders. However, the study also acknowledges the limitations of existing literature and emphasizes the importance of considering cultural and individual differences in art creation and interpretation. Overall, this study protocol outlines a comprehensive approach to assessing distinctive features in the art of individuals with psychotic symptoms, aiming to enhance the diagnostic and therapeutic utility of art therapy in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41252001What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.