ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2026
Towards More Effective Treatments in Stroke-Induced Aphasia: A Discussion of the Evolution of Treatment Programs.
Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
THEORETICAL
backgroundAs the number of patients with post-stroke aphasia continues to rise, the need for implementing effective rehabilitation interventions that can comprehensively address the complex clinical, cognitive, and linguistic profile of patients with aphasia (PWA) becomes mandatory.
objectiveThe purpose of this review paper is to systematize the existing literature concerning the multiple rehabilitation interventions that target linguistic and non-linguistic deficits of PWA.
methodOur article provides a narrative review, comprised of English language articles retrieved from academic databases, such as PubMed, SpringerLink, and ScienceDirect. The search period spans from January 1990 to April 2024.
resultsThe categorization of non-linguistic interventions in post-stroke PWA follows three distinct pathways. One line of research focuses on cognitive training of specific cognitive domains, the other focuses on more comprehensive rehabilitation paradigms, while the third combines typical Speech Language Therapy (SLT) with non-linguistic cognitive rehabilitation interventions.
conclusionGiven the complexity of clinical manifestations of aphasia, the multifaceted cognitive profile of PWA, as well as the methodological variation of the research dedicated to rehabilitation interventions, the answer to the question of intervention effectiveness remains elusive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41251999What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.