ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2025
Application of Interprofessional Sequential Simulation Teaching Mode in Standardized Training of Radiation Oncology Residents.
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To evaluate the effectiveness of an interprofessional sequential simulation (ISS) teaching mode in improving theoretical knowledge, practical skills, interdisciplinary collaboration, and anxiety management among radiation oncology residents (RORs) and radiation therapists during standardized training in China. A prospective randomized controlled study enrolled 70 RORs and radiation therapists (35 control vs. 35 simulation group). The control group received traditional clinical training, while the simulation group underwent ISS training, integrating role-play, standardized patient interactions, and collaborative radiotherapy planning. Outcomes were assessed via theoretical/practical examinations (0-100 points), interdisciplinary competency scales (ICA and TBP), anxiety levels (GAD-7), and satisfaction surveys. The simulation group demonstrated superior post-training theoretical scores (90.97 ± 4.53 vs. 86.54 ± 3.99, p < 0.0001) and practical performance (91.71 ± 4.61 vs. 87.83 ± 3.50, p = 0.0007) compared to the control group. Interdisciplinary collaboration scores (ICA: 43.83 ± 2.96 vs. 40.31 ± 3.38; TBP: 10.49 ± 2.03 vs. 7.94 ± 1.81, p < 0.001) and patient satisfaction (90% vs. 75%, p = 0.026) were significantly higher in the simulation group. Anxiety levels decreased markedly post-intervention for residents (GAD-7: 4.83 ± 1.32 to 4.23 ± 1.37, p = 0.056) and patients (moderate to mild, p < 0.05). The ISS model enhances RORs and radiation therapists' clinical competency, fosters interdisciplinary teamwork, and reduces anxiety, offering a robust framework for improving radiation oncology training in resource-limited settings. Future studies should explore long-term behavioral impacts and scalability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41251978What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.