Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41251977›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2025

Teaching Oncology in the Medical Degree: Integrating Knowledge and Experience of a Multidisciplinary Tumour Board.

José Expósito-Hernández, Mariana F Fernández, Mercedes Villalobos, Javier López-Hidalgo, Rosario Guerrero-Tejada, Isabel Tovar-Martín, Rosario Ching-López

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

José Expósito-HernándezRadiation Oncology Department, Virgen de Las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain.
Mariana F FernándezBiomedical Research Institute (Ibs.GRANADA), Granada, Spain. marieta@ugr.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6417-8914
Mercedes VillalobosBiomedical Research Institute (Ibs.GRANADA), Granada, Spain.
Javier López-HidalgoPathological Anatomy Unit, San Cecilio University Hospital, Granada, Spain.
Rosario Guerrero-TejadaRadiation Oncology Department, Virgen de Las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain.
Isabel Tovar-MartínRadiation Oncology Department, Virgen de Las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain.
Rosario Ching-LópezRadiation Oncology Department, Virgen de Las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain.

Funding

Universidad de Granada 2022-23 (#22-109).Universidad de Granada Teaching Innovative ProjectUniversidad de Granada within FIDUS programme
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is recognised as a major health problem that requires a multidisciplinary approach to achieve the best possible outcomes. The rapid and important changes in the understanding of cancer need to be incorporated into clinical practice. Because of both the magnitude and pace of these changes, medical schools must also assess and update the level of knowledge and skills that need to be taught in oncology training. Multidisciplinary tumour boards (MTB) integrate the knowledge of various healthcare disciplines, assuring treatment according to the best available evidence or multidisciplinary consensus. However, these attributes are not sufficiently integrated into the curricula of Spanish medical schools. To fill this gap, specific seminars were designed and implemented during the medical degree programme at the University of Granada (Spain), over two academic years for 510 students. The first group focused on integrating knowledge in the field of oncology, while the second group focused on the purpose of the MTB in clinical practice and its role in decision-making in specific tumour cases. All the seminars included real cases of patients with medium-complexity tumours, along with the clinical practice guidelines from a university hospital as a reference. After two years of development, the initiative has been evaluated (15-items survey), with a high level of satisfaction among students and teachers, but awaiting the collection of objective learning outcomes. This article describes the seminars, along with how they were organized. and discusses the value of introducing validated pedagogical techniques. The incorporation of well-received pedagogical innovations, such as team-based and small-group teaching, together with 'flipped classroom' techniques, focuses both on students' individual knowledge and ability to interact with others.

Indexed as

Flipped classroomKnowledge integration and multidisciplinary tumour boardMedical schoolOncology educationTeam-based learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.