ArticleJournal of community genetics2025
Genetic knowledge and attitudes toward genomics across academic disciplines, a cross-sectional survey of university students in Samborondón, greater Guayaquil, Ecuador.
Article in Journal of community genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Gut Microbiota and Probiotics Among Ecuadorian Medical Students.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advances in genetics and genomics have enabled personalized medicine, requiring genetic knowledge among professionals and the public to adequately interpret results. Evaluating university students' knowledge and attitudes about genetics and genomics is crucial, as this key demographic can influence public health outcomes. This cross-sectional study utilized the Public Understanding and Attitudes towards Genetics and Genomics (PUGGS) questionnaire, including demographics, knowledge about gene-environment interactions and modern genetics and genomics, and attitudes concerning gene therapy and genetic testing. Participants were selected using the convenience sampling method. Surveys were completed by 776 students from diverse academic disciplines enrolled at two universities in Greater Guayaquil, Ecuador. The median number of correct responses was 9/19 (49%) for the total cohort indicating an intermediate level of genetic knowledge, with healthcare students scoring slightly higher than those in engineering and social sciences. While participants showed strong comprehension of gene-environment interactions and gene regulation, their grasp of epigenetic concepts was weaker. Although attitudes toward genetic testing were generally positive, reservations emerged regarding human genetic enhancement and alterations to natural genetic structures, particularly among social science students. The identified gaps in knowledge and perceptions highlight opportunities for educational interventions. Future studies should track long-term progress and evaluate courses modernizing outdated concepts, clarifying genome structure, and exploring gene therapy ethics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.