ReviewClinical rheumatology2026
Recurrent vertebrobasilar stroke in giant cell arteritis associated with progressive prostate carcinoma: a case report and literature review.
Review in Clinical rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most prevalent large-vessel vasculitis in patients ≥ 50 years, with a frequent but poorly defined association with malignancy. We present a 71-year-old patient with progressive prostate cancer and a deleterious presentation of GCA, manifesting as repeated vertebrobasilar ischemia. Diagnostic delay occurred because of an atypical disease presentation and the assumed rarity of concurrence of GCA and cancer. Drug interactions between prednisolone and enzalutamide delayed optimal treatment. A literature review was performed to detail the incidence, clinical characteristics, and disease course of patients with GCA and solid malignancy in order to provide practical recommendations for patients with solid tumors and GCA. Concurrence of GCA and cancer is prevalent, with approximately 10% of GCA patients diagnosed with malignancy within 1 year. However, well-controlled studies do not suggest a heightened incidence of cancer in GCA. Retrospective case-control studies suggest no relevant differences in symptoms and disease course between GCA patients with and without cancer. Specifically, no difference in ischemic complications is reported. A paraneoplastic course with GCA subsiding shortly after tumor removal was reported in four cases. Most patients received standard immunosuppression; only two cases were identified in whom cancer treatment without immunosuppression resolved vasculitis. In conclusion, this report underscores that GCA and cancer concur frequently. Although this appears largely coincidental or surveillance-related, GCA sporadically occurs as a paraneoplastic phenomenon. Standard immunosuppressive treatment of GCA should not be withheld in oncology patients, although drug interactions with anticancer drugs are frequent and could warrant dose adjustments of anti-inflammatory drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41251917What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.