Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41251892›Full record

ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2025

The sonic energy of background music impacts cognitive performances: a behavioral and physiological investigation.

Maria Francesca Gigliotti, David Lauret, Yvonne N Delevoye-Turrell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria Francesca GigliottiFilboost, Strasbourg, France. mariaf.gigliotti@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2989-0724
David LauretFilboost, Strasbourg, France.ORCID 0009-0004-0329-3897
Yvonne N Delevoye-TurrellUniv. Lille, CNRS, UMR 9193 - SCALab - Sciences Cognitives Et Sciences Affectives, 59000, Lille, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4034-3684

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-21-ESRE-0030Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique CNRS 80 Prime - TEM
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Listening to background music while engaging in mental tasks is a popular habit. Despite the diverse playlists conceived for this purpose, the optimal sonic energy (calming vs. arousing) of a musical excerpt that may benefit cognitive performances remains poorly understood, particularly in relation to the specific demands of the task. To clarify this issue, we asked participants to perform an Attention Network Test and a phonemic Verbal Fluency Task, in silence and while listening to low- and high-arousing unfamiliar musical excerpts. Excerpts sonic energy was determined by musical features analysis, followed by a subjective evaluation of the excerpts' arousal potential. Behavioral, physiological and subjective measures were collected. Results showed that the presence of both the low- and high-arousing music increased physiological activation and enhanced the pleasure experienced during task execution. Behavioral findings revealed beneficial effects of background music on executive control-related attentional abilities and word production fluidity across time. Finally, participants experienced more cognitive effort during the attentional task with the high-arousing excerpt, while no differences were observed in the Verbal Fluency Task. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring background music sonic energy to the demands of the task in order to mobilize resources and enhance enjoyment without disrupting cognitive performances.

Indexed as

ArousalAttentionAuditory PerceptionCognitionExecutive FunctionMusicPleasureAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultArousalCognitive loadExecutive functionsMusical featuresTask demands

Identifiers

PMID41251892
PMCPMC12627320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.