ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
Evaluating the safety and efficacy of rapid bolus-only dexmedetomidine for pediatric EEG sedation: a retrospective study.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dexmedetomidine is an α2-adrenergic receptor agonist known for its sedative and analgesic properties. It produces an EEG pattern resembling Stage II sleep without interfering with EEG interpretation, making it a preferred agent for pediatric sedation, particularly during EEG procedures. Traditionally administered as a bolus followed by continuous infusion, this approach can challenge workflow efficiency and staffing in resource-limited settings. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a rapid bolus-only dexmedetomidine protocol for pediatric EEG sedation. This retrospective study included pediatric patients aged 1-18 years undergoing EEG with sedation at the Hadassah Medical Center between 2015 and 2023. All patients received dexmedetomidine via intravenous bolus (1-2 mcg/kg), with additional doses (0.5-2 mcg/kg) as needed. No continuous infusion was used. Primary outcomes were sedation success rate, time to onset and recovery, and adverse events. A total of 345 patients were included. Sedation was successfully achieved in 99% of cases, with a median sedation onset of 5 min. The overall adverse event rate was 8.4%, with no sentinel events. Hypotension and hypoxia occurred in 1.7% of patients each. Patients with upper airway abnormalities were more likely to require additional doses (P = 0.001) and showed a trend toward increased adverse events (P = 0.095). Adverse event risk increased with higher total dexmedetomidine doses (≥ 3 mcg/kg, P = 0.001). Conclusion: Rapid bolus administration of dexmedetomidine without continuous infusion provides effective sedation for pediatric EEG, with a good safety profile, similar to other sedation protocols. This cost-effective approach offers significant advantages for settings with limited staffing or high patient turnover. What is Known: • Dexmedetomidine is well known as an effective agent for EEG procedural sedation. What is New: • We present a novel IV single bolus protocol utilizing dexmedetomidine that demonstrates a high success rate in achieving adequate sedation, is associated with a low incidence of adverse events, and requires an overall lower dosage compared to traditional methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.