ArticleAIDS and behavior2026
Streamlining Stigma Measurement: Validation and Abridgment of the HIV Stigma Scale for Pregnant Women Living with HIV in South Africa.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The HIV Stigma Scale (HSS) is a 40-item psychometrically sound measure capturing four domains of perceived stigma. A 25-item version has been validated in South India. However, the HSS has not been validated among pregnant women with HIV (WWH) in South Africa, a population facing significant stigma. Moreover, they could benefit from the abridged measure to be more efficiently connected to related interventions. Analyzing data from a sample of pregnant WWH (N = 472) recruited from an antenatal care clinic in eThekweni, Kwazulu-Natal Province, we: (1) conducted confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) to determine if the 4-factor structure of the original 40-item scale holds for the 25-item version in this sample; (2) further shortened the 25-item version using data-driven item reduction, and (3) conducted a comprehensive psychometric evaluation on the abridged version that included internal consistency and construct validity. The CFA confirmed a four-factor structure of the 25-item scale (CFI = 1.00, RMSEA = 0.03, SRMR = 0.04) in pregnant WWH. For model identification, we retained three items per factor. CFA of this 12-item version revealed model fit (CFI = 1.00, RMSEA = 0.01, SRMR = 0.03). All four subscales in the abridged scale showed satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's α > 0.80) and construct validity. This is the first study validating the HSS among pregnant WWH in an HIV-endemic setting and developing a psychometrically robust 12-item version, maintaining the four-factor structure of the original measure. Clinically, the abridged HSS enables more efficient screening and reduces participant burden, which could improve reporting and early implementation of stigma reduction interventions in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.