ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Development and validation of an AI-augmented deep learning model for survival prediction in de novo metastatic colorectal cancer.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Internal Validation of a Novel Prognostic Score in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Comparative Retrospective Cohort Study with the Glasgow Prognostic Score and Gustave Roussy Immune Score.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- A multi-model prediction of a stage-specific prognosis for colorectal cancer using attention-driven deep ensemble learning on genomic profiling data.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Deep multimodal fusion of patho-radiomic and clinical data for enhanced survival prediction for colorectal cancer patients.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAccurate prognostication in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains challenging due to disease heterogeneity. This study aimed to develop and validate an artificial intelligence-augmented deep learning model for risk stratification in patients receiving first-line treatment. METHODS/PATIENTS: We developed a deep neural network with artificial intelligence augmentation, using data from patients with de novo mCRC treated at two major reference centers between 2010 and 2024. Patients with BRAF-mutated and MSI-high tumors were excluded. The model incorporated clinical characteristics, laboratory parameters, and treatment data. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS).
resultsA total of 214 patients were included in the study, with 127 patients in the training and internal validation cohort and 87 patients in the external validation cohort. The model stratified patients into three distinct risk groups with significantly different PFS (log-rank p < 0.001). The low-risk group (n = 34) achieved a median PFS of 16.8 months with a 29% event rate, the medium-risk group (n = 33) showed a median PFS of 9.3 months with a 58% event rate, and the high-risk group (n = 34) demonstrated a median PFS of 7.5 months with a 76% event rate. Feature importance analysis identified carcinoembryonic antigen, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, and liver function tests as the strongest predictors of PFS. The model’s performance was consistent across both internal and external validation cohorts.
conclusionsThis deep learning model demonstrates robust prognostic capabilities in mCRC, effectively stratifying patients into distinct risk groups. The model could aid in clinical decision-making and treatment planning for patients receiving first-line therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.