ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2025
Biomechanical analysis of additional vancomycin in articulating knee spacers: determining the threshold for structural failure.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPeriprosthetic joint infections (PJI) pose considerable challenges in arthroplasty, with two-stage revisions involving the use of antibiotic-loaded spacers being the prevailing treatment modality for chronic low-grade PJI. Whilst the incorporation of antibiotics has been demonstrated to enhance infection management, the biomechanical impact of such agents on polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) spacers remains to be elucidated. The present study evaluates the load-bearing capacity of spacers with varying antibiotic concentrations of vancomycin in order to determine structural failure thresholds. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of twenty PMMA knee spacers were subjected to testing, with the samples divided into two distinct groups based on the antibiotic concentration: a low concentration group (5% vancomycin) and a high concentration group (20% vancomycin). The spacers were subjected to uniaxial loading in two configurations: a standard weight-bearing position and a dislocated position with 10° femoral angulation. The breaking forces were measured using a servo-hydraulic testing machine. Statistical analyses were performed using Mann-Whitney-U tests, with significance at p < 0.05.
resultsIn the standard position, the mean breaking force for the low and high antibiotic groups was 38.7 ± 9.3 kN and 35.5 ± 5.8 kN, respectively (p = 0.421). In the dislocated position, breaking forces were significantly lower at 2.2 ± 0.7 kN and 2.0 ± 0.3 kN, respectively (p = 0.311). Spacer fractures occurred exclusively in femoral components, with a 17-fold reduction in load capacity in dislocated configurations. The antibiotic concentration of vancomycin exerted no significant effect on biomechanical integrity.
conclusionIn the experimental ex vivo study, it was demonstrated that vancomycin concentrations of up to 20% by volume in PMMA knee spacers do not significantly affect the structural integrity. However, the positioning of the spacer has been shown to have a significant impact on biomechanical stability, with dislocation having a substantial effect on load capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.