Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41251829›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025

Differences in cancer pain management between outpatient and inpatient settings: A cross-sectional survey of nursing practices in China.

Yingtao Meng, Jiao Lv, Yuanyuan Li, Xiao Han, Yali Wang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Association of a standardized painless ward model with cancer pain control and hospitalization outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yingtao MengNursing Department, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, 250117, China.
Jiao LvDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, 250117, China.
Yuanyuan LiDepartment of Radiotherapy, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, 250117, China.
Xiao HanDepartment of Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, 250117, China.
Yali WangDepartment of Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, 250117, China. wangyali20000@outlook.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective cancer pain management is critical for patient quality of life but may vary significantly between inpatient and outpatient care settings. This study aimed to identify and compare pain assessment practices, patient behaviors, and treatment barriers across these environments.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among 730 nursing professionals from 75 hospitals across China. Respondents completed structured questionnaires evaluating pain assessment frequency, methods, treatment responses, and perceived barriers in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Comparative analyses were performed using chi-square tests or Fisher's exact test. Multivariable adjusted logistic regression models were used to explore the associations.

resultsPain assessment was performed more frequently in inpatient settings (79.3%) than outpatient settings (57.6%) (difference, 21.8%; 95% CI, 4.6-38.9%; P < 0.01). Alignment with patients' self-assessments did not differ significantly (71.9% inpatient vs. 63.6% outpatient; P > 0.05). Patients in inpatient care more often reported pain proactively (60.0% vs. 24.2%; difference, 35.7%; 95% CI: 20.7-50.8%; P < 0.01). Major outpatient barriers included difficulty in patient pain description (90.9% vs. 20.9%; difference, 70%; 95% CI, 59.7-80.2%; P < 0.01), while inpatient settings were affected by provider inattention to pain (82.4% vs. 21.2%; difference, 61.1%; 95% CI, 46.9-75.4%; P < 0.01). The proportion of patients receiving treatment after pain assessment was similar (74.9% inpatient vs. 66.7% outpatient; P > 0.05). However, outpatient nurses reported greater reluctance to prescribe opioids (24.2% vs. 7.0%; difference, 17.2%; 95% CI, 2.5-32.0%; P < 0.01), and outpatient settings saw a higher incidence of ineffective analgesia (33.3% vs. 18.8%; difference, 14.5%; 95% CI, -1.8-30.9%; P < 0.05).

conclusionThe exploratory cross-sectional survey suggests that cancer pain managements between outpatient and inpatient settings appear to be different, particularly in assessment frequency, patient communication, and opioid prescribing practices. Targeted, setting-specific interventions may be beneficial to optimize pain control and improve patient outcomes in both environments.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareCancer PainPain ManagementPractice Patterns, Nurses'AdultChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInpatientsLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedOutpatientsPain MeasurementQuality of LifeCancer painInpatient careNursing practiceOpioid useOutpatient carePain management

Identifiers

PMID41251829
PMCPMC12627119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.