Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41251818›Full record

ArticleInternational ophthalmology2025

Adverse events of trabecular micro-bypass minimally invasive glaucoma surgery devices: a five-year analysis from the FDA MAUDE database.

Yousef Hawas, Alina Ghazou, Martin W Gerges, Mohamed Marouf, Ibraheem M Alkhawaldeh, Asem A Alqudah

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yousef HawasFaculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Alina GhazouFaculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan. aaghazou19@med.just.edu.jo.
Martin W GergesFaculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Mohamed MaroufFaculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Ibraheem M AlkhawaldehFaculty of Medicine, Mutah University, Al-Karak, Jordan.
Asem A AlqudahDivision of Ophthalmology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2020, 76 million people around the world had glaucoma, and by 2040, that number is predicted to rise to 111.8 million. Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) has become an effective method to treat open-angle glaucoma. It lowers the pressure inside the eye by improving the drainage mechanism of the eye's aqueous humor. MIGS devices, such as the iStent® and Hydrus®, aid in aqueous outflow and patency maintenance. However, their long-term safety and efficacy require ongoing post-market surveillance across diverse patient populations. It's important to know how safe implanted devices like MIGS are over a long period of time.

objectiveTo conduct a five-year retrospective analysis of adverse events associated with the Hydrus® Microstent and iStent® trabecular micro-bypass MIGS devices, as reported in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database, and to characterize the spectrum and reporting patterns of device- and patient-related complications to better define their real-world safety profile in glaucoma management. STUDY

designA retrospective case-series.

methodsAll MAUDE reports submitted between January 1, 2020, and October 31, 2024, containing product codes "OGO" and "KYF" were screened. A total of 784 eligible reports involving Hydrus and various iStent models were analyzed for device-related and patient-related adverse events. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize event types and frequencies. Heatmaps and visualizations were also created using Python Google Colab.

resultsAmong 784 reports, injuries accounted for 63.1% of cases, and malfunctions for 36.9%. A total of 503 device-related and 1,012 patient-related problems were identified. Among device-related problems, malposition was the most commonly reported issue (37.3% of device problem reports), followed by breakage (23.5%) and obstruction (9.0%). Frequent patient-related events included increased IOP (19.4%), hyphema (12.1%), and foreign body in patients (10.6%). Among Hydrus®-related reports, malposition was the most frequently reported device issue; among iStent® Inject W reports, breakage predominated.

conclusionThe Hydrus® and iStent® trabecular micro-bypass MIGS devices have shown generally favorable safety over five years of postmarket surveillance. However, device malposition and mechanical failures were frequently reported in voluntary submissions, though, due to the absence of denominator data, these reports cannot be interpreted as evidence of higher real-world incidence compared to clinical trials. These findings inform surgical training, patient counseling, and highlight the need for prospective real-world registries to establish true complication rates.

Indexed as

Glaucoma Drainage ImplantsGlaucoma, Open-AngleIntraocular PressureMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsTrabecular MeshworkUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAgedDatabases, FactualFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlaucomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAdverse eventsHydrus MicrostentiStent Trabecular BypassMAUDE databaseMinimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.