SynthesisNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
Efficacy and safety of lorundrostat in uncontrolled hypertension: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- When Methods Matter: An Umbrella Review of Lorundrostat and the Impact of Analytical Decisions on Reported Blood Pressure and Safety Outcomes.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2026Pooled it
- Can baxdrostat redefine blood pressure control in resistant and uncontrolled hypertension? a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lorundrostat, a novel selective aldosterone synthase inhibitor, has emerged as a potential treatment for uncontrolled hypertension. However, a comprehensive summary of its efficacy and safety profile is currently lacking. This meta-analysis aims to synthesize evidence from published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the clinical benefits and risks of lorundrostat in this patient population. Following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for RCTs comparing lorundrostat with placebo. The primary outcomes were changes from baseline in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Data were pooled using a random-effects model to calculate mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes and risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Three RCTs comprising 1568 patients were included. Compared to placebo, lorundrostat significantly reduced both 24-h systolic blood pressure (MD: - 6.65 mmHg; 95% CI: [- 9.95 to - 3.35]) and office systolic blood pressure (MD: - 7.94 mmHg; 95% CI: [- 9.72 to - 6.15]). While the risk of serious adverse events was comparable, lorundrostat was associated with a higher incidence of hyperkalemia (RR: 5.47; 95% CI: [1.55 to 19.36]) and hyponatremia (RR: 1.95; 95% CI: [1.13 to 3.36]). Notably, lorundrostat significantly reduced the risk of adrenal insufficiency (RR: 0.15; 95% CI: [0.03 to 0.91]). Lorundrostat may be an effective agent for lowering blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Its safety profile is acceptable but requires careful monitoring of serum electrolytes and renal function. The reduced risk of adrenal insufficiency highlights its selectivity and potential as a valuable therapeutic option. Further large-scale, long-term studies are needed to confirm its sustained benefits and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.