ArticleArchives of microbiology2025
Isolation and complete genome analysis of porcine circovirus-1 associated with reproductive failurein swine: foremost study in India.
Article in Archives of microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated 100 porcine tissue samples from stillborn, dead and or aborted foetus with the history of reproductive infections from Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, and Karnataka. All samples were screened for the genomes of PCV1, PCV2, PCV3, CSFV, PPV, PRRSV, and Brucella species using specific PCR assays. Out of 100 samples screened, the molecular positivity rates were 12% for PCV1, 11% for PCV2, 2% for PCV3, 6% for CSFV, 9%for PPV and 5%for Brucella genomes. Among the twelve PCV1 positive samples, four were positive for the PCV1 genome alone, five showed co-infection with PCV2, two with PPV, and one with CSFV. No co-infection of PCV1 with PCV3, PRRSV and Brucella were detected in this study. Four PCV1-positive samples, confirmed to be free from other co-infections, were propagated in PCV1-free PK-15 cells and subjected to five successive blind passages. The presence of PCV1 was confirmed by PCR in two of the isolates, which were subsequently subjected to whole-genome sequencing using the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform. Complete genome sequences of two PCV1 isolates (K44ABT and L11ABT)comprising 1759 base pairs with a G + C content of 48%were submitted to GenBank under the accession numbers PQ303661 and PQ303662 respectively. The ORF1 and ORF2 regions encoded the replicase (312 amino acids) and capsid (233 amino acids) proteins respectively. BLAST analysis and genome similarity analysis revealed > 99% identity with published PCV1 strains, and phylogenetic analysis showed clustering with strains from India, USA, and China. Analysis of Rep protein revealed highly conserved sequences in both the PCV1 isolates, but, exhibited a substitution alanine to valine at position 102in the receptor-binding domain (RBD) located in the capsid protein. This altered RBD showed homology with those of virulent PCV2 and PCV4, suggesting a potential for broader cell binding similar to that seen in pathogenic circoviruses. Further, examination of three key B-cell epitopes 85GGTNPLP91, 162FTPKPELDQTIDWFHPNNK180, and 219YVQFREFILKDPLNE233 in capsid protein showed notable variation at 170 and 233 positions with substitution of Q to K and E to K respectively. This study represents the first complete genome analysis of PCV1 associated with reproductive failure in domestic pigs from southern India, providing important insights into its molecular characteristics. The observed genetic variations, particularly in the capsid protein, imply a potential shift in PCV1 toward enhanced host adaptation and pathogenicity in pigs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41251728What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.