ArticleThe British journal of surgery2025
Anatomical basis for sensory preservation in robotic mastectomy.
Article in The British journal of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nipple-areolar complex neurotization in implant-based breast reconstruction: a narrative review.Gland surgery · 2026Review
- Single axillary incision for minimal access (endoscopic or robotic-assisted) nipple sparing mastectomy: axillary crease or lateral chest wall incision?Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSensory preservation of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) is crucial for physical, psychological, and sexual health after mastectomy. Robotic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy (rNSM) techniques have shown promise in preserving NAC sensation, but there is limited detailed anatomical evidence supporting this observation. The aim of this study was to characterize the anatomical pathways and variability of sensory nerves innervating the NAC, particularly focusing on implications for the development of improved nerve-preserving techniques during breast surgery.
methodsA cadaveric anatomical study on three adult female cadaveric donors (six breasts) was undertaken, which was complemented by a systematic review of the existing literature using a modified PRISMA approach.
resultsThe anterior cutaneous branch (ACB) and the lateral cutaneous branch (LCB) of the fourth intercostal nerve (ICN) were consistently the primary cutaneous nerves innervating the NAC. The ACB of the fourth ICN, particularly its lateral division, followed a superficial and consistent subdermal route bypassing breast tissue in all cadavers. Conversely, the LCB of the fourth ICN, specifically its anterior division, traversed deeper breast tissue to reach the NAC. Variable supplementary contributions were observed from the second, third, and fifth ICNs, and previously undocumented ancillary branches. Significant inter-individual anatomical variability was noted.
conclusionThe consistent superficial pathway of the ACB of the fourth ICN provides a clear anatomical rationale for improved sensory preservation observed in rNSM, given the procedure's lateral incision and precise dissection capabilities. Recognition of anatomical variability and detailed nerve trajectories should guide surgical planning to optimize sensory outcomes in breast cancer surgery and reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.