Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41251529›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025

Genomic Profiling of Intraocular Leiomyomas Reveals Recurrent Copy Number Alterations.

Vivian Tang, Yubai Chou, Cuyan Demirkesen, Michele M Bloomer, Joseph Brooks Crawford, Ahmet M Sarici, Carol Shields, Ralph C Eagle, Codrin E Iacob, Walter Patrick Devine and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Vivian TangDepartment of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Yubai ChouOcular Oncology Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Cuyan DemirkesenDepartment of Pathology, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Istanbul, Turkiye.
Michele M BloomerDepartment of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Joseph Brooks CrawfordDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Ahmet M SariciDepartment of Ophthalmology, Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkiye.
Carol ShieldsOcular Oncology Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ralph C EagleDepartment of Ocular Pathology, Wills Eye Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Codrin E IacobDepartment of Pathology, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Walter Patrick DevineDepartment of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Tatyana MilmanDepartment of Ocular Pathology, Wills Eye Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Melike PekmezciDepartment of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Leiomyomas are benign smooth muscle tumors that commonly present in the uterus, soft tissue, skin, and gastrointestinal tract but in rare cases can also arise within the eye. Notably, intraocular leiomyomas often show slightly different histopathologic and immunohistochemical features, referred to as mesectodermal morphology, given their presumed neural crest origin. Genetic and cytogenetic alterations of intraocular leiomyomas, as well as their association with various clinical and histopathologic features, have not been previously studied. Methods: We identified eight patients diagnosed with intraocular leiomyoma and performed targeted next-generation sequencing, whole transcriptome RNA sequencing, and chromosomal copy number analysis on those with sufficient residual tissue. Results: Copy number analysis demonstrated multiple, recurrent whole-chromosome losses (including losses of 1, 2, 3, 10, 15q, 22q) suggestive of near haploidization of the genome. DNA sequencing did not reveal any pathogenic single-nucleotide variants, deep deletions, amplifications, or structural rearrangements. Whole-transcriptome RNA sequencing performed in a subset of cases did not show any pathogenic or likely pathogenic gene fusions. Tumors with mesenchymal versus mesectodermal morphology and those with or without histologically worrisome features did not show any differences in their copy number profile. Conclusions: Genetic and cytogenetic features of intraocular leiomyomas are different from the leiomyomas of uterine and deep soft tissues, as well as from uveal melanocytic tumors. Translational Relevance: Recurrent whole-chromosome losses in the absence of mutations or fusions are common among intraocular leiomyomas and may aid in the diagnosis.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsEye NeoplasmsLeiomyomaAdultAgedFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID41251529
PMCPMC12636993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.