ArticleHuman molecular genetics2026
Combining functional annotation and multi-trait fine-mapping methods improves fine-mapping resolution at glycaemic trait loci.
Article in Human molecular genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Meta-Analysis of Glucose and Insulin-related traits Consortium (MAGIC) identified 242 loci associated with glycaemic traits fasting insulin (FI), fasting glucose (FG), 2 h-Glucose (2hGlu), and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c). However, for the majority, the causal variant(s) remain(s) unknown. Modelling multiple traits and integrating functional annotations have each been shown to improve fine-mapping resolution. Here, we aimed to determine whether combining these techniques would further improve fine-mapping resolution. Using single-trait fine-mapping results from FINEMAP as input, we performed multi-trait fine-mapping with flashfm at 50 loci significantly associated with more than one glycaemic trait. We used fGWAS to build models of enriched annotations by considering 32 cell-type specific and 28 static annotations. We used these models to define prior probabilities to perform annotation informed fine-mapping with both FINEMAP (single-trait) and flashfm (multi-trait). Multi-trait fine-mapping of 106 locus-trait associations significantly (P = 1.23 × 10-17) reduced the median size of the credible sets accounting for 99% of the posterior probability of being causal (99CS) to 21.5 variants compared to the 60.5 variants in single-trait fine-mapping. Annotation informed single-trait fine-mapping of 211 locus-trait associations reduced (P = 4.24 × 10-12) the median 99CS size from 72 in agnostic single-trait fine-mapping to 52 variants. Annotation informed multi-trait fine-mapping of 110 locus-trait associations led to a further significant (P = 2.69 × 10-18) decrease in median 99CS size to 14.5 variants compared to 51.0 in annotation informed single-trait fine-mapping. In conclusion, by applying combined multi-trait and annotation informed fine-mapping to 50 loci, we refined the number of potential causal variants by 71.1% compared to single-trait agnostic fine-mapping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.