ArticleStatistics in medicine2025
Causal Inference for First Non-Fatal Events With the Competing Risk of Death: A Principal Stratification Approach.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Causal Inference for First Non-Fatal Events With the Competing Risk of Death: A Principal Stratification Approach.Statistics in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In clinical trials involving both mortality and morbidity, an active treatment can influence the observed risk of the first nonfatal event either directly, through its effect on the underlying nonfatal event process, or indirectly, through its effect on the death process, or both. Discerning the direct effect of treatment on the underlying first nonfatal event process holds clinical interest. However, with the competing risk of death, the Cox proportional hazards model that treats death as non-informative censoring and evaluates treatment effects on time to the first nonfatal event provides an estimate of the cause-specific hazard ratio, which may not correspond to the direct effect. To obtain the direct effect on the underlying first nonfatal event process, within the principal stratification framework, we define the principal stratum hazard and introduce the proportional principal stratum hazards model. This model estimates the principal stratum hazard ratio, which reflects the direct effect on the underlying first nonfatal event process in the presence of death and simplifies to the hazard ratio in the absence of death. The principal stratum membership is identified probabilistically using the shared frailty model, which assumes independence between the first nonfatal event process and the potential death processes, conditional on per-subject random frailty. Simulation studies are conducted to verify the reliability of our estimators. We illustrate the method using the Carvedilol Prospective Randomized Cumulative Survival trial, which involves heart-failure events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.