Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41251390›Full record

ReviewMedical education2026

Journey mapping as an inclusive research tool: Capturing the learning journeys of health professions educators with dyslexia.

Sarah McLaughlin, Asim Ali, Steve Jennings

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah McLaughlinUniversity of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0009-0001-5174-6238
Asim AliUniversity of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0009-0005-9496-594X
Steve JenningsUniversity of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5251-3308

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe field of health professions education has seen growing emphasis on inclusive pedagogies and learner diversity. Universal Design for Learning (UDL) offers a framework for designing educational experiences that accommodate diverse learning needs. Applying this principle to research, we must consider not only what we research but also how we research. Dyslexia is one example where traditional research practices may unintentionally marginalise participant voices. Conventional research interviews-especially those relying heavily on verbal recall and heavy question-answer formats-may not be the most accessible or inclusive method for gathering rich data with participants who are dyslexic. However, recent research reports that those with dyslexia excel at visualisation, creative thinking, identifying patterns and oral communication. In response to these characteristics and challenges, we adopted journey mapping to create a more inclusive research experience.

methodsWe explored the learning journeys of health professions educators who have dyslexia. We conducted six semi-structured online interviews utilising participant-created journey maps as a creative and inclusive method for data construction. The maps were used as a visual prompt and a reflection tool before and during the interviews. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

resultsThe mapping provided participants with an enjoyable, engaging, autonomous means of reflection, enabling them to structure and tell their stories in a personally meaningful way. It supported verbal articulation during interviews by offering visual scaffolding and helped reduce cognitive load by allowing time to reflect, plan and organise responses in advance. DISCUSSION: Adapting research methods to ensure a more inclusive approach has the potential to create more authentic, rich data and a fun and engaging experience for participants. The visual nature of mapping is a key advantage; however, researchers must mitigate the potential harm to participants elicited through the depth of reflection of negative experiences. Clear instructions and reassurance relating to creative confidence are key to executing this approach.

Indexed as

DyslexiaHealth OccupationsLearningHumansInterviews as TopicQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID41251390
PMCPMC12913234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.