ArticleMedical mycology2025
Management of mould pneumonia in resource-limited settings in Asia: A Delphi-based consensus statement by the Asia Fungal Working Group.
Article in Medical mycology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mould pneumonia can be life-threatening, and its incidence is increasing in Asia. Due to significant variability in diagnostic setups and the availability of antifungal agents, especially in resource-limited settings, the current treatment practices and recommendations for local clinicians are poorly described. This study aimed to develop a consensus statement on the clinical management of mould pneumonia in Asia, particularly within resource-limited settings. Clinicians and infectious disease experts from the Asia Fungal Working Group answered questions about the regional epidemiology as well as diagnostic and resource-limited treatment approaches of mould pneumonia. Guided by a literature review, 22 initial questions were generated and voted upon anonymously using a Delphi-based methodology with predefined consensus criteria. The study comprised two rounds: one to generate summary statements based on the panelists' questionnaire responses, and the other to review, confirm and rate the level of agreement of the consensus statements using a five-point Likert scale. The panelists generated 21 summary statements on the epidemiology (5), diagnosis (8), and treatment (8) of mould pneumonia, 20 of which achieved ≥ 70% consensus. Through a consensus-building exercise, clinical experts from Asia developed a set of 21 consensus statements for the diagnosis and management of mould pneumonia in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.