Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41251284›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2025

Embedding coproduction: translational impacts of a sustained research-policy coalition in Tasmania, Australia.

Kim Jose, Fiona Proudfoot, Melanie Sharman, Michelle Kilpatrick, Kate Garvey, Verity Cleland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Audit of the Tasmanian Transport-Related Physical Activity Policy Environment-Lessons for Comprehensive Policy Making.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kim JoseMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, 17 Liverpool Street, Hobart, Tasmania 7000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9346-6429
Fiona ProudfootMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, 17 Liverpool Street, Hobart, Tasmania 7000, Australia.
Melanie SharmanMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, 17 Liverpool Street, Hobart, Tasmania 7000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1949-4920
Michelle KilpatrickMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, 17 Liverpool Street, Hobart, Tasmania 7000, Australia.
Kate GarveyTasmanian Department of Health, GPO Box 125, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia.
Verity ClelandMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, 17 Liverpool Street, Hobart, Tasmania 7000, Australia.

Funding

Tasmanian Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-term inter-organizational research-policy collaborations that support research coproduction are uncommon and an overlooked preventive health research impact pathway. This study examines how an Australian research-policy coalition involving approximately 25 research and policy members from the Menzies Institute for Medical Research (Menzies), University of Tasmania and Public Health Services, Tasmanian Government Department of Health has evolved over time. Using a mixed methods approach the study investigates the elements that have been critical for supporting the long-standing nature of the collaboration and identifies translational research impacts. Data sources included coalition documentation (i.e. contract reports, funding agreements), stakeholder interviews (N = 9), and a workshop with informal network mapping (N = 13). Interview transcripts and documents were analysed through thematic and discourse analysis. Network data mapping individual connections between coalition members and between the coalition and other organizations were collated and analysed descriptively. Impacts were categorized using Sibley's seven effects of research coproduction. Analysis of four tri-annual funding agreements (between 2009 and 2023) revealed discoursal changes in measuring preventive health research planning, outcomes and impacts. A growing focus on relational engagement between researchers and policymakers across research priority areas, collaborative practices and joint capacity building activities to promote coproduction of translational research was evident. Interviews revealed these changes were intentional and while valued, the changes created tensions around the expectations of involvement for some coalition members. System factors undermined some engagement strategies such as co-location. Coalition members had worked together for 5.8 years on average (range 0-35 years) most commonly through information sharing, joint research planning and strategy development. Coalition impacts covered all seven effects of research coproduction. This study highlights the value of a long-term commitment to an inter-organizational research-policy coalition to enhance preventive health knowledge translation into policy and practice. Focusing on building and strengthening relational and systemic approaches to researcher-policymaker engagement, the coalition has evolved to embed research coproduction to enhance research relevance and impact.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorHealth PolicyTranslational Research, BiomedicalCapacity BuildingHumansTasmaniacommunity networkspartnershipsqualitative research (document analysis)translational research

Identifiers

PMID41251284
PMCPMC12624391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.