ArticleEpilepsia open2026
sEEG-guided responsive neurostimulation to treat neocortical epilepsy: A multicenter retrospective study of the efficacy and safety of depth electrode-mediated neuromodulation.
Article in Epilepsia open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Virtual Responsive Neurostimulation Implantation: From Intracranial Connectivity to Optimized Lead Placement.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- sEEG-guided responsive neurostimulation to treat neocortical epilepsy: A multicenter retrospective study of the efficacy and safety of depth electrode-mediated neuromodulation.Epilepsia open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPivotal trials have established the effectiveness of the Responsive Neurostimulation System (RNS® System) in treating focal epilepsy. In clinical trials, depth leads were primarily used to treat mesial temporal seizure onsets while cortical strip leads were used to treat neocortical seizure onsets. Here, we systematically analyze the safety and efficacy of stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG)-guided depth leads to provide responsive stimulation to neocortical gray matter.
methodsPatients were stratified as strong responders (>median cohort seizure reduction %), weak responders (>0% and ≤median cohort seizure reduction %), and anti-responders (≤0%) based on percent seizure reduction at 1 year post-implant (1-Y). Pre-operative T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and post-operative computed tomography images were merged, and the Euclidean distance between the sEEG epileptic focus (sEEG-EF) and the nearest RNS System depth lead contacts was calculated.
resultsA total of 87 depth leads were implanted in 55 patients across neocortical brain regions. The median reduction in clinical seizures improved from 66.7% at 1-Y to 77.5% at long-term follow-up (LTFU: 2.35 ± 0.95 years), with 10 patients (18.2%) achieving complete seizure freedom. Seven patients (12.7%) experienced six serious adverse events. At 1-Y, shorter Euclidean distance between the sEEG-EF and RNS System depth leads predicted improved seizure outcome in strong responders (β = -0.84, p = 0.008) but not in weak responders (β = 0.21, p = 0.9) or anti-responders (β = -20.34, p = 0.11). At LTFU, there was no significant relationship between Euclidean distance and seizure reduction in strong responders (β = 0.77, p = 0.18), weak responders (β = 2.05, p = 0.54), or anti-responders (β = 0.24, p = 0.99). Exploratory analyses at 1-Y showed nominal associations between older age (ρ = 0.32), longer epilepsy duration (ρ = 0.27), and non-mesial temporal sEEG-EFs and greater seizure reduction; however, none survived Bonferroni correction (adjusted α = 0.0027; all post-correction p > 0.0027), and no associations were observed at LTFU. SIGNIFICANCE: In this series, neocortical depth leads for RNS therapy had favorable safety and efficacy and proximity to the sEEG-EF drove initial outcomes for strong responders to RNS therapy. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: In this multi-center study, patients with difficult-to-treat seizures received brain-responsive stimulation using a device called responsive neurostimulation (RNS), which delivers small electrical pulses to reduce seizures. We focused on patients treated with electrodes placed in the brain's outer regions (the neocortex) and guided by a mapping procedure called sEEG. On average, patients had their seizures cut by two-thirds after one year and by more than three-quarters with longer follow-up, with about one in five becoming seizure-free. The treatment was safe, and closer electrode placement to the seizure source helped explain early-but not long-term-improvements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.