Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41250918›Full record

ArticleActa ophthalmologica2026

Clinical recommendations for early identification of patients with open-angle glaucoma at higher risk of low adherence to topical treatment: An Italian Delphi consensus.

Roberto G Carassa, Giovanni Pomponio, Luca Agnifili, Antonio Maria Fea, Michele Iester, Giorgio Marchini, Enrico Martini, Stefano Miglior, Francesco Oddone, Luca Rossetti and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta ophthalmologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Roberto G CarassaCentro Italiano Glaucoma, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni PomponioOspedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy.
Luca AgnifiliDepartment of Medicine and Aging Sciences, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1625-6305
Antonio Maria FeaDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6551-6054
Michele IesterClinica Oculistica, Di.N.O.G.M.I., University of Genova, e IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Giorgio MarchiniDepartment of Surgical Odontostomatological Maternal and Child Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Enrico MartiniU.O. Ophthalmology, Sassuolo Hospital, Sassuolo, Italy.
Stefano MigliorOphthalmology Department, Policlinico di Monza Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Francesco OddoneGlaucoma Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Bietti, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2504-0004
Luca RossettiEye Clinic and Head and Neck Department, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Matteo SacchiOphthalmology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Sassari, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6399-3140
Carlo Enrico TraversoClinica Oculistica, University of Genova, Department Di.N.O.G.M.I., Italy Casa Della Salute, Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0510-6651
Michele FigusDepartment of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2243-9033

Funding

AbbVie
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIt is important for clinicians to identify patients with glaucoma at higher risk of poor adherence to topical therapy at an early stage to prescribe alternative treatments. An expert-based set of statements was developed to assist clinicians in the early identification of patients at high risk of low adherence and subsequent poorer clinical outcomes.

methodsA two-step strategy was used. First, statements were developed by a panel of experts using data from a literature search as a starting point. Second, we measured agreement with the statements in a representative group of ophthalmologists managing patients affected by glaucoma.

resultsA total of 18 statements and consensus was reached for all. The available evidence and clinical experience have identified some subpopulations at high risk of poor adherence. These include young individuals with competing interests, being frequently away from home, multiple comorbidities and particularly when they affect joint function of the hands or cognitive abilities, being asymptomatic, and being poorly informed about the severity of the disease. The unavailability of caregivers and living alone seems to be relevant factors, particularly in older and more frail patients.

conclusionTaken together our results allow us to profile patients with glaucoma who will be more likely to show poor adherence to topical treatments. Moreover, the consensus statements can be used to identify patients who are unsuitable for topical drops and who would benefit more from alternative treatments.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsConsensusDelphi TechniqueGlaucoma, Open-AngleIntraocular PressurePractice Guidelines as TopicAdministration, TopicalEarly DiagnosisHumansItalyOphthalmic SolutionsAntihypertensive AgentsOphthalmic SolutionsadherenceconsensusDelphiglaucomatopical therapy

Identifiers

PMID41250918
PMCPMC13166385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.