ArticleAmerican journal of biological anthropology2025
Revised Body Mass Estimates for Extinct Lemurs.
Article in American journal of biological anthropology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Revised Body Mass Estimates for Extinct Lemurs.American journal of biological anthropology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesBody mass estimates for extinct animals are critical for informing hypotheses and analyses related to behavioral ecology, extinction risk, and locomotor modes. These estimates underpin reconstructions of behavioral ecology, especially for Madagascar's extinct subfossil lemurs. Previous estimates, based on femoral and humeral midshaft cortical areas, did not account for phylogenetic relatedness, potentially impacting their accuracy. This study updates body mass estimates for extinct lemurs using phylogenetically informed methods. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe analyzed 64 femora from 10 extinct lemur species. Each specimen was scanned using a Bruker SkyScan 1178 micro-CT scanner to obtain high-resolution images of femoral cortical areas. These data were combined to form a dataset comprising more than 125 subfossil lemur specimens across 15 identifiable species. Phylogenetically informed regression models (pGLS) incorporating femoral cortical surface area (FCSA) and femoral length (FL) as predictors were applied. Model fits were evaluated using Akaike information criterion (AIC) and adjusted R
resultsNatural log-transformed FCSA emerged as the best predictor of natural log-transformed BM among living primates. This pGLS regression equation was used to estimate body mass and lower and upper 95% prediction limits for all subfossil specimens, and weighted average BM estimates were obtained for each species. Our updated body mass estimates are consistently smaller than those previously reported. DISCUSSION: These estimates provide a more accurate basis for understanding extinct lemur life history traits, morphometrics, and ecological adaptations. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating evolutionary context in paleontological and ecological research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.