ArticleCase reports in dentistry2025
Innovative Composite Resin Restoration Techniques in Posterior Permanent Teeth of Young Patients: Presentation of Two Clinical Cases.
Article in Case reports in dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Three-Dimensional Analysis of Morphological Adaptation and Wear in Restorations Performed Using the Stamp Technique with Different Viscosity Composite Resins.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This case report highlights the clinical application of stamp and injection molding techniques for the restoration of young permanent teeth, as efficient, esthetic, and less invasive alternatives to conventional restorative approaches. However, each has distinct limitations that should be taken into consideration for optimal clinical outcomes. Report: The first case was an anxious 14-year-old girl, who presented to the Postgraduate Clinic of Paediatric Dentistry Department (NKUA), for the restoration of a right upper first permanent molar. Intraoral examination confirmed an extensive occlusal carious lesion involving the distobuccal cusp. Given the need for direct esthetic and functional restoration, the injection molding technique was selected as the most appropriate treatment approach ensuring precise anatomical replication and seamless restoration with the least clinical time and effort, reducing the stress of the patient. The second case was a 9-year-old girl, also examined at the clinic with carious lesions on the occlusal surfaces of the first permanent mandibular molars, but without extensive tissue loss. Given the nature of the lesions, the stamp technique was chosen as the preferred method of restoration, allowing for quick and efficient restoration by replicating the tooth's original morphology. Both techniques provided functional and esthetic results, proving their effectiveness in pediatric restorative dentistry while minimizing chairside time and preserving natural tooth structure. Conclusion: Stamp and injection molding techniques offer promising alternative solutions for direct composite restorations of posterior permanent teeth in young patients. Their ability to provide predictable, esthetic, and efficient restorations underscores their clinical significance. However, careful case selection, meticulous application, and periodic recall examinations remain essential to optimize their outcomes and ensure long-term success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.