Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41250745›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

Multilevel Selection in the Margins: A Review of Its Representation in Undergraduate Biology Textbooks.

Charlotte A Greene, Sarah J McPeek, Lisa Mitchem, Anne B Clark, Vincent A Formica, Conner S Philson, Robin A Costello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Charlotte A GreeneDepartment of Biology University of Virginia Charlottesville Virginia USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8097-9970
Sarah J McPeekDepartment of Biology University of Virginia Charlottesville Virginia USA.
Lisa MitchemDepartment of Biological Sciences Northern Illinois University DeKalb Illinois USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4293-6208
Anne B ClarkDepartment of Biological Sciences Binghamton University Binghamton New York USA.
Vincent A FormicaDepartment of Biology Swarthmore College Swarthmore Pennsylvania USA.
Conner S PhilsonNatural Reserve System University of California Santa Barbara California USA.
Robin A CostelloDepartment of Biological Sciences University at Buffalo Buffalo New York USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multilevel selection (MLS) is a foundational framework that expands the concept of natural selection beyond the traditional focus on individuals or genes to larger units, like groups. Despite strong empirical support and applications in a broad range of biological fields, MLS, often referred to as group selection, has a controversial history, which has impeded its wide use and led to incorrect inferences on the sources and strength of selection. Here, we explore how MLS is currently presented to undergraduate biology students by analyzing the content of nine commonly used Evolutionary Biology and Animal Behavior textbooks. We ask whether and how the textbooks describe MLS-as part of the toolbox of evolutionary theory, as a controversial topic, or not at all. Using qualitative textual analysis and descriptive statistics, we found that MLS was mentioned in all of the textbooks analyzed, although usually only in the context of the evolution of social behavior. MLS was generally dismissed as unimportant when compared to individual selection and given less space and fewer examples than kin selection. We highlight the value of a more accurate presentation of MLS and present suggestions for teaching MLS in undergraduate courses based on empirically supported practices in biology education.

Indexed as

biology education researchevolution educationgroup selectionlevels of selectionmultilevel selectionundergraduate biology education

Identifiers

PMID41250745
PMCPMC12620055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.