Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41250734›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Postoperative Pancreatitis Following Intraoperative Cholangiography: A Case Report.

Chenyi Mao, Timothy Kenyon-Smith, Matthew J Shears

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chenyi MaoDepartment of Medical Education, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, AUS.
Timothy Kenyon-SmithDepartment of General Surgery, Northeast Health Wangaratta, Wangaratta, AUS.
Matthew J ShearsDepartment of General Surgery, Northeast Health Wangaratta, Wangaratta, AUS.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) is frequently performed during laparoscopic cholecystectomy to delineate biliary anatomy and detect choledocholithiasis. While generally safe, postoperative pancreatitis following IOC is an uncommon and under-recognized complication. We report the case of a 41-year-old male patient who presented with postprandial pain on a background of symptomatic gallstones. Preoperative blood tests, including liver function tests, were unremarkable, and ultrasound demonstrated gallstones with a non-dilated common bile duct (CBD). He underwent an uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy with IOC, which revealed contrast reflux into the pancreatic duct. The following day, he developed severe epigastric pain radiating to the back, nausea, vomiting, tachycardia, and low-grade fever. Blood tests showed elevated lipase (2000 U/L) and deranged liver function. Computed tomography (CT) cholangiogram confirmed acute interstitial pancreatitis without evidence of bile leak, choledocholithiasis, or pancreaticobiliary maljunction. He was managed with intravenous fluids, patient-controlled analgesia, and supportive care, and discharged home on day 4. This case highlights the importance of recognising contrast reflux as a possible precipitant of pancreatitis and the need for close postoperative monitoring.

Indexed as

intraoperative cholangiogramlaparoscopic cholecystectomypancreaticobiliary maljunctionpancreatitispostoperative pancreatitis

Identifiers

PMID41250734
PMCPMC12620036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.