Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41250715›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Conventional Penile Reconstruction Versus Penile Allotransplantation: A Comprehensive Review.

Naga Anvesh Kodali, Ramu Janarthanan, Omer Faruk Dirican, Zeynep Demir, Bedreddin Sazoglu, Vijay S Gorantla, Yalcin Kulahci, Fatih Zor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Naga Anvesh KodaliSurgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.
Ramu JanarthananSurgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.
Omer Faruk DiricanSurgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.
Zeynep DemirSurgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.
Bedreddin SazogluSurgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.
Vijay S GorantlaSurgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.
Yalcin KulahciSurgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.
Fatih ZorPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Penile loss from trauma, oncologic resection, congenital anomalies, or gender-affirming needs represents a devastating condition with profound functional and psychosocial implications. Conventional reconstructive techniques, including radial forearm, fibula, scapular, and anterolateral thigh flaps, have evolved over decades and provide patients with an acceptable neophallus capable of voiding and sexual activity. However, these methods remain limited by donor-site morbidity, prosthesis-related complications, high revision rates, and the inability to restore natural erectile tissue or fully replicate penile appearance. In recent years, penile allotransplantation has emerged as an alternative within the field of vascularized composite allotransplantation, offering restoration of native anatomy and the potential to achieve sensation, erectile function, and even fertility. To date, only five penile transplantations have been reported worldwide, each demonstrating encouraging short-term outcomes but raising complex challenges. The primary concerns are the lifelong requirement for systemic immunosuppression, the unknown long-term consequences of rejection episodes, and significant ethical and psychosocial considerations, including donor allocation, patient selection, and recipient and partner acceptance. In this narrative review, we compared conventional reconstructive approaches with transplantation, drawing on published literature and clinical experience to highlight indications, surgical techniques, functional outcomes, and psychosocial dimensions. While reconstruction remains the standard of care and provides reliable outcomes compatible with normal life expectancy, transplantation holds promise as a quality-of-life-enhancing option for carefully selected patients. Ongoing clinical research, refinement of surgical and immunological strategies, and the development of robust preclinical models will be essential in defining the role of penile allotransplantation in the future.

Indexed as

microsurgical reconstructionpenile allotransplantationpenile reconstructionvascularized composite allotransplantationvca

Identifiers

PMID41250715
PMCPMC12619966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.