Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41250700›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Management of a Foreign Body in the Throat: Should Awareness of Channelled Flexible Nasendoscopes Be Encouraged Among Junior ENT Doctors?

Siddharth Kotikalapudi, Atanu Maity, Amro Hassaan

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Siddharth KotikalapudiOtolaryngology, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, GBR.
Atanu MaityOtolaryngology, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, GBR.
Amro HassaanOtolaryngology, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ingested foreign bodies in the upper aero-digestive tract are a common ENT emergency. Initial assessment and management by a junior ENT doctor involves removal of the foreign body under direct visualisation, with escalation to removal under general anaesthesia (GA) if unsuccessful. However, removal under general GA carries procedural risks, anaesthetic risks, and a higher cost profile. An adult female presented to our unit with a fish bone lodged in the right pyriform fossa. Initial removal with instruments and direct visualisation with a flexible nasendoscope (without a working channel) was attempted but was unsuccessful. She was scheduled for removal under GA. At morning handover, an alternative approach was suggested (a method not routinely familiar to the on-call junior doctor team) and trialled using a single-use flexible nasendoscope with a working channel. Following topical anaesthesia, the scope was passed orally, and biopsy forceps were introduced via the accessory channel, which allowed for the successful removal of the fish bone. The patient was discharged the same day without complications, avoiding admission and GA. She was followed up with a telephone call and reported that she had returned to her normal routine with no significant complications. While not a novel treatment plan, flexible nasendoscopes with working channels represent a valuable adjunct in escalation protocols for foreign body retrieval. Their use can reduce the need for GA, prevent unnecessary admissions, and optimise resource use in selected cases. Education and training for these instruments can be considered or encouraged among junior ENT doctors to avoid unnecessary admissions for these presentations. However, broad conclusions should not be extrapolated from a single case study, and further audits and surveys of junior doctors' knowledge and expertise are required.

Indexed as

airway foreign bodycost-benefit analysisent proceduresfish boneforeign body retrieval

Identifiers

PMID41250700
PMCPMC12620012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.