Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41250676›Full record

ArticlePlant direct2025

Revealing the Application of Synchrotron-Based X-Ray Computed Tomography in Healthy Versus Unhealthy Interior Lodgepole Pine (

Emelie Dykstra, Jarvis A Stobbs, Esteban Galeano, Barb R Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant direct, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emelie DykstraDepartment of Renewable Resources University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada.
Jarvis A StobbsCanadian Light Source Inc Saskatoon Saskatchewan Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0971-2744
Esteban GaleanoDepartment of Renewable Resources University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8330-8240
Barb R ThomasDepartment of Renewable Resources University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9718-9297

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reproductive cycle of interior lodgepole pine spans approximately 26 months, with seed cones initiating in late summer, followed by pollen conelets emerging the next spring when pollination occurs. Fertilization and cone maturation occur in the subsequent spring and fall. Successful pollination, critical for seed conelet retention, requires an ~80% success rate. In June 2020, 30 pine clones (genotypes), with contrasting conelet abortion rates, were selected from a production seed orchard in Alberta, Canada. Sixty conelets per clone (30 aborted and 30 healthy) were collected for synchrotron radiation-based microcomputed tomography (SR-μCT) analysis. A subset of two contrasting clones (1401 and 596) was selected for detailed study. Conelets were transported to the Canadian Light Source in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, for SR-μCT Phase Contrast Imaging (PCI), where samples were mounted and scanned using a PCO Edge 5.5 sCMOS camera and analyzed using Avizo software to visualize internal structures. Results showed that healthy conelets in clones 1401 and 596 had greater tissue volume (248.8 and 251.9 mm

Indexed as

conelet abortionconifersnondestructive imagingpollination successseed orchard managementsynchrotron radiation–based microcomputed tomography (SR‐μCT)

Identifiers

PMID41250676
PMCPMC12620052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.