Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41250674›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2025

Genomic optimum contribution selection and mate allocation using JuMP.

Patrik Waldmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Patrik WaldmannResearch Unit of Mathematical Sciences, University of Oulu, Oulu, FIN-90014, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2390-6609

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Artificial selection improves desired traits, but reduces genetic diversity within populations. Modern breeding programs aim to balance genetic gain with the maintenance of genetic variation to ensure long-term sustainability. Optimum contribution selection (OCS) is a widely adopted strategy that maximizes genetic gain while limiting the rate of inbreeding, traditionally relying on pedigree data. However, genomic relationship matrices offer a more accurate measure of genetic relatedness. A subsequent step to OCS involves mate allocation (MA) to optimize breeding plans, which often presents significant computational challenges for large datasets. Results: We developed a two-stage genomic OCS and mate allocation (GOCSMA) method implemented in JuMP/Julia. The OCS problem is formulated as a linear program with quadratic constraints and solved efficiently using the conic operator splitting method (COSMO). The subsequent MA problem, expressed as a mixed integer program, is solved with the SCIP framework's branch-cut-and-price algorithm. Applying GOCSMA to the simulated QTLMAS2010 dataset, we observed efficient convergence for OCS, balancing genetic gain with coancestry constraints better compared to traditional top selection. The MA stage consistently achieved very low runtimes ( Availability and implementation: Source code and documentation are available at https://github.com/patwa67/GOCSMA.

Identifiers

PMID41250674
PMCPMC12619993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.