Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41250647›Full record

ArticleDisease models & mechanisms2025

Building a framework for reproducibility: the case for standardized data reporting and metadata integration in zebrafish research.

Mee S Ngu, Sabrina Toro, Alexa Burger, Khai C Ang

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Disease models & mechanisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mee S NguDepartment of Pathology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7638-4659
Sabrina ToroDepartment of Genetics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7264, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4142-7153
Alexa BurgerDepartment of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7137-3910
Khai C AngDepartment of Pathology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7695-9953

Funding

A 3D zebrafish microanatomical and gene expression atlas for disease modelingR24OD037633 · OD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI Khai C Ang, JOHN H. POSTLETHWAIT · 2025 to 2026
$1.7M
Advancing a community-led zebrafish toxicology phenotype atlasR24ES036130 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Alexa Burger, Sabrina Toro · 2024 to 2026
$1.6M
Cheng-Leong Family FoundationNIEHS NIH HHS R24 ES036130NIEHS NIH HHS R24ES036130NIH HHS R24 OD037633ORIP NIH HHS 1R240D037633
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zebrafish (Danio rerio) is a leading vertebrate model that has greatly advanced research across fields such as developmental biology, toxicology, immunology and genetics. The rapid generation of high-throughput datasets fueled by advances in genomics, imaging and artificial intelligence (AI) has expanded the zebrafish as an animal model for human disease research and therapeutic discoveries. However, the absence of globally adopted, standardized data reporting methods within the zebrafish community undermines data usability, interoperability and reproducibility. Inconsistent documentation of experimental parameters - including genes, alleles, developmental stages and imaging details - creates barriers to integrating and comparing results across laboratories and disciplines. Challenges are especially pronounced for reporting developmental stages, imaging metadata and chemical exposure protocols, impeding robust data integration and reuse. Although resources such as the Zebrafish Information Network (ZFIN) and global initiatives such as the Monarch Initiative promote ontology-driven data standards, widespread implementation remains limited owing to gaps in community awareness and engagement. The use of species-specific and integrative ontologies is essential for unambiguous data annotation and reliable cross-species comparison, particularly in the context of accelerating AI-driven research. In this Editorial, we summarize current standards relevant to the zebrafish field and highlight the urgent need for collective action. Broad community participation in developing, refining and consistently adopting robust data standards will enhance reproducibility, facilitate interdisciplinary collaboration and ensure that zebrafish research remains a pillar for future scientific and AI-powered advances.

Indexed as

MetadataZebrafishAnimalsReproducibility of ResultsMetadataStandardsZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID41250647
PMCPMC12673962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.