ArticleCardio-oncology (London, England)2025
Real-world analysis of cardiovascular adverse events and risk factors after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.
Article in Cardio-oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic Factors Analysis in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
- Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated arrhythmias: clinical challenges, artificial intelligence-enhanced monitoring, and management strategies.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- The mechanisms and therapeutic advances of interactions between breast cancer and cardiovascular diseases.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer therapy, offering significant survival benefits across diverse malignancies. However, growing evidence suggest an increased occurrence of cardiovascular adverse events (CVAEs) following ICI, which remain poorly characterized in large, real-world populations.
objectivesTo quantify the incidence and spectrum of CVAEs following ICI initiation and identify demographic, clinical, and treatment-related risk factors for CVAE development.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data from the OneFlorida + Clinical Research Network. Adult cancer patients (≥ 18 years) with cancer who started FDA-approved ICIs between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2023, were included. Eligible patients had either ≥ 1 inpatient or ≥ 2 outpatient encounters after. The primary outcome was new-onset CVAE within one year. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and multivariable Cox regression evaluated associations with risk factors.
resultsAmong 9,541 patients initiating ICIs, 2,320 (24.3%) developed a CVAE within one year, with arrhythmia (15.7%), heart failure (5.2%), and stroke (4.1%) being the most common. Cardiometabolic comorbidities (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and obesity) were independently associated with increased CVAE risk. CVAE incidence varied significantly by cancer type, with highest risk observed in breast, liver, and lung cancers compared to melanoma. Triple checkpoint blockade (CTLA-4 + PD-(L)1 + LAG-3) conferred a modest but significant increase in CVAE risk.
conclusionCVAEs occurred frequently after ICI initiation, with substantial variation by cancer type, comorbidities, and treatment regimen. These findings highlight the importance of cardiovascular risk assessment and monitoring to optimize outcomes in immuno-oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.